Meghalaya High Court
Date Of Decision: 06.03.2025 vs State Of Meghalaya on 6 March, 2025
Author: W. Diengdoh
Bench: W. Diengdoh
2025:MLHC:146-DB
Serial No. 04
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Crl.M.C. No. 139 of 2024
Date of Decision: 06.03.2025
Shri. Ronal Murmu,
Son of Shri. Joseph Murmu,
Resident of Umran Dairy,
P.O. Nongpoh, P.S. Nongpoh,
District: Ri-Bhoi, Meghalaya.
Presently lodged in District Prison &
Correctional Home, Ri-Bhoi District,
Nongpoh.
::::: Applicant
-Vs-
State of Meghalaya
through Public Prosecutor.
::::: Opposite Party/Respondent
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge
Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : S.D. Upadhaya, Legal Aid Counsel
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl. PP.
Mr. R. Gurung, GA.
i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No
Law journals etc.:
1
2025:MLHC:146-DB
ii) Whether approved for publication
in press: Yes/No
Per W. Diengdoh, (J):
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Heard Mr. S.D. Upadhaya, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the
applicant, who has submitted that the applicant had preferred an appeal
before this Court against the impugned judgment dated 12.03.2020 and
related sentence dated 10.07.2020 passed by the learned Special Judge
(POCSO), Ri-Bhoi District, Nongpoh in Special (POCSO) Case No. 54 of
2015, whereby he was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous
imprisonment for a term of 10(ten) years with fine of ₹ 25,000/- (Rupees
twenty-five thousand) only, and in default of payment of fine to undergo
another 6(six) months simple imprisonment.
2. However, there has been a delay of 1557 days in preferring the
appeal. The delay is mostly on the ground that the applicant is not well-
versed with the process of filing of the appeal and not being conversant with
the same. It was only when a Legal Aid was offered to him that he realized
that it was his right to prefer the appeal. Hence, this application for
condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
3. Mr. S. Sengupta, learned Addl. PP for the State respondent has
2
2025:MLHC:146-DB
no strong objection to the prayer made as far as the application for
condonation of delay is concerned.
4. On consideration of the submission made, this Court is
convinced that though, the delay is inordinate, nevertheless, the grounds
cited are found convincing. Accordingly, the delay of 1557 days in filing
the appeal is condoned.
5. Misc. Case stands disposed of.
6. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list it for admission
after 1(one) week.
(B. Bhattacharjee) (W. Diengdoh)
Judge Judge
Signature Not Verified 3
Digitally signed by
DARIKORDOR NARY
Date: 2025.03.06 19:14:20 IST
[ad_1]
Source link
