Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Sah vs The State Of Bihar on 4 March, 2025

0
44

of the Indian Penal Code (in short the ‘I.P.C.’).

3. A Notice was issued to opposite party no. 2/

complainant namely, Prabhash Chandra Sah, which was duly

served upon him and was represented before this Court

through advocate of his choice.

4. Precisely, the case of the complainant as it

appears from the narration of his complaint, that he had been

carrying out his business of fruits and coconuts for many

years in his shop situated in Girdhari Sah Lane, Sujaganj,

Bhagalpur, which was purchased by him with his three

brothers through a registered sale deed in the year 1999 from

Hirendra Prasad Sah and Mahendra Prasad Sah. It further

appears from narration of complaint that petitioner being one

of the influential and rich person of the locality and being

owner of Girdhari Sah Hatia, with intention to grab his shop,

first offered O.P. No.2 to sale the shop but when he refused to

do so, petitioner along with his associates began to harass

him and in furtherance of that began to dig a trench adjacent

to his shop as to get it demolished. It was further alleged that

when the trench was dug upto depth of 10 ft., having
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17078 of 2020 dt.04-03-2025

apprehension of demolition of his shop building, he informed

S.H.O. Kotwali and S.S.P. Bhagalpur in writing, but no action

was taken by the police.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here