Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Dashrath Meena Son Of Jasram Meena vs The State Of Rajasthan … on 4 March, 2025
Bench: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Bhuwan Goyal
[2025:RJ-JP:9348-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D. B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 2037/2025
Dashrath Meena Son of Jasram Meena, Aged About 24 Years,
Resident Of Village Sedpada, Post Hudla, Tehsil Mahwa, District
Dausa (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue,
Secretariat Jaipur.
3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Local Bodies,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. The Director, Local Bodies, C-Scheme Jaipur
5. The Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Mahwa, District
Dausa (Rajasthan)
6. The Administrator-Cum-Chairman, Municipal Board,
Mahwa, District Dausa (Rajasthan)
7. The District Collector, Dausa, District Dausa (Rajasthan).
8. The Sub Divisional Officer, Mahwa, District Dausa
(Rajasthan).
9. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Mahwa, District Dausa (Rajasthan).
10. Satyendra Singh Kushwah Son Of Karan Singh Kuswah,
Resident Of Village Hadiya, Tehsil Mahwa, District Dausa
(Rajasthan).
----Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta Advocate with Mr.
Rahul Sharma Advocate.
For Respondents : Ms. Shikha Sharma Advocate on
behalf of Mr. G.S. Gill Additional
Advocate General.
(Downloaded on 05/03/2025 at 10:22:34 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:9348-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-2037/2025]
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
04/03/2025
1. This PIL petition has been filed by the petitioner raising a
disputed issue of fact by stating that the land in dispute has been
wrongly granted by way of patta by Panchayat Samiti Mahuwa,
District Dausa.
2. Panchayat Samiti Mahuwa has not been impleaded as party
respondent in the petition.
3. The patta, granted way back in the year 2007, records that
there was pre-existing residential building since last 50 years.
4. The petition involves disputed questions of facts which
cannot be gone into in this PIL petition.
5. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to the
petitioner to avail the remedy as may be available under the law.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
MANOJ NARWANI-ANU/13
(Downloaded on 05/03/2025 at 10:22:34 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_1]
Source link
