Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Aman Gupta vs The State Of Chhattisgarh on 4 March, 2025
Author: Rajesh Bindal
Bench: Rajesh Bindal
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2025
(@ SLP(CRL.) No.16696/2024)
AMAN GUPTA APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant has been arraigned as an
accused in Crime No. 641/2022 registered
at Police Station Sakri, District
Bilaspur and subsequently charge-sheeted
for the offences punishable under
Sections 302, 34, 120-B, 341, 201 of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 25
and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.
3. Taking into consideration the period of
incarceration which is more than 2 years
Signature Not Verified
and the fact that there are no prior
Digitally signed by
criminal antecedents in which the
SWETA BALODI
Date: 2025.03.05
17:16:42 IST
Reason:
appellant is involved, we are inclined to
1 SLP(CRL.) No.16696/2024
set aside the impugned order and grantbail to the appellant.
4. Accordingly, the impugned order stands
set aside and the appellant is granted
bail, subject to the terms and conditions
that may be imposed by the Trial Court.
5. The appeal is allowed accordingly.
6. Pending application(s), if any, shall
stand disposed of.
……………………………………………………J.
[M.M. SUNDRESH]
……………………………………………………J.
[RAJESH BINDAL]
NEW DELHI;
4th MARCH, 2025
2 SLP(CRL.) No.16696/2024
ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.8 SECTION II-C
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)
No(s). 16696/2024
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order
dated 08-05-2024 in MCRC No. 2257/2024 passed by
the High Court of Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur]
AMAN GUPTA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Respondent(s)
Date : 04-03-2025 This petition was called on for
hearing today.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ameet Kr Deshpande, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Akshat Shrivastava, AOR
Mrs. Pooja Shrivastava, Adv.
Mr. Satvic Mathur, Adv.
Mr. Palash Pareek, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Praneet Pranav, D.A.G.
Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made
the following
O R D E R
Leave granted.
The relevant portion of the order reads
as under:-
‘Accordingly, the impugned
order stands set aside and
the appellant is granted
bail, subject to the terms3 SLP(CRL.) No.16696/2024
and conditions that may be
imposed by the Trial Court.
The appeal is allowed
accordingly.’The appeal is allowed in terms of the
signed order.
Pending application(s), if any, shall
stand disposed of.
(SWETA BALODI) (POONAM VAID)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
(Signed order is placed on the file)4 SLP(CRL.) No.16696/2024
[ad_1]
Source link
