Ravindra Ram @ Rabindra Ram vs The State Of Bihar on 4 March, 2025

0
138

Patna High Court – Orders

Ravindra Ram @ Rabindra Ram vs The State Of Bihar on 4 March, 2025

Author: Alok Kumar Pandey

Bench: Alok Kumar Pandey

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.937 of 2024
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2020 Thana- KUTUMBA District- Aurangabad
                 ======================================================
                 Ravindra Ram @ Rabindra Ram Son of Late Lohari Ram R/o Village- Samda
                 Ibrahimpur, P.S.- Kutumba, District- Aurangabad (Bihar)

                                                                                 ... ... Appellant/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant       :       Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Respondent      :       Km. Shashi Bala Verma, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
                                            and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI)

4   04-03-2025

Heard Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, learned Advocate

for the appellant and Km. Shashi Bala Verma, learned A.P.P for

the Respondent-State.

2. This appeal has been filed on behalf of the

appellant under Section 374(2) read with Section 389(1) of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment of

conviction dated 28.05.2024 and the order of sentence dated

07.06.2024 rendered by the Court of learned Additional

Sessions Judge-II, Aurangabad, Bihar in Sessions Trial No. 18

of 2021 (214 of 2023) arising out of Kutumba P.S. Case No. 133

of 2020, whereby the appellant has been convicted for the

offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 of the
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.937 of 2024(4) dt.04-03-2025
2/5

Indian Penal Code ( in short ‘IPC‘) and sentenced to undergo

rigorous imprisonment for life (in short ‘RI’) and fine of Rs.

25,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC

and, in default of payment of fine, the appellant shall have

further to undergo simple imprisonment (in short ‘SI’) for one

year. Further, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo RI for

two years with fine of Rs. 5,000/- for the offence punishable

under Section 147 of IPC and, in default of payment of fine, the

appellant shall have further to undergo SI for four months and

further the appellant has been sentenced to undergo RI for two

years with fine of Rs. 5,000/- for the offence punishable under

Section 148 of IPC and, in default of payment of fine, the

appellant shall have further to undergo SI for four months. All

the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.

3. Learned Advocate for the appellant, at the outset,

submitted that the present appeal has been admitted and for the

present appellant prays for grant of bail and for suspension of

sentence imposed by the learned trial court till final disposal of

the appeal.

4. Learned Advocate for the appellant, at the outset,

submitted that there is no eye-witness to the incident in

question, however, the prosecution had projected six persons as
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.937 of 2024(4) dt.04-03-2025
3/5

eye-witnesses. During cross-examination, the said six witnesses

specifically admitted that they have not seen the occurrence in

question. At this stage, learned Advocate for the appellant has

placed on record the order dated 13.12.2024 passed by this

Court in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 805 of 2024 and allied

matters. Learned Advocate submits that by way of the said

order, thirteen accused, who have been convicted by the trial

court along with the present appellant, have been released on

bail and the sentence imposed by the trial court has been

suspended qua the other thirteen co-convicts. It is submitted that

similar allegations are levelled agianst the present appellant.

Learned Advocate has referred to the FIR/written complaint

given by the informant and thereafter contended that similar

type of allegations are levelled against one Sudama Ram and

Uday Ram who have been released on bail. Learned Advocate,

therefore, urged that on the ground of parity, the case of the

appellant be considered.

5. On the other hand, learned APP for the Respondent-

State has though opposed the prayer for grant of bail and for

suspension of sentence, he is not in a position to dispute the fact

that the other thirteen co-convicts have been released on bail

vide common order dated 13.12.2024 passed in Criminal Appeal
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.937 of 2024(4) dt.04-03-2025
4/5

(DB) No. 805 of 2024 and allied matters.

6. We have considered the submissions canvassed by

the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. We have also

perused the materials placed on record as well as the trial court

records and the order dated 13.12.2024. Prima facie, it

transpires that the role attributed to the present appellant is

similar to that of co-convicts Sudama Ram and Uday Ram. So

far as the aforesaid two co-convicts are concerned, this Court

vide order dated 13.12.2024 has released the aforesaid two co-

convicts along with eleven other co-convicts on bail and thereby

suspended the sentence qua thirteen co-convicts. We are of the

view that the ground of parity would be applicable and on that

ground, case of the appellant requires consideration.

7. Accordingly, appellant is ordered to be released on

bail during pendency of the present appeal on executing bond of

Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) and upon furnishing

two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Aurangabad, Bihar in

Sessions Trial No. 18 of 2021 (214 of 2023) arising out of

Kutumba P.S. Case No. 133 of 2020 and the sentence imposed

by the trial court is suspended so far as this appellant is

concerned.

Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.937 of 2024(4) dt.04-03-2025
5/5

8. It is clarified that the aforesaid observations are

tentative observations made by this Court while considering the

request of the appellant for grant of bail.

9. The appellant should co-operate in this court till

disposal of the appeal.

10. Realisation of fine shall also remain stayed during

the pendency of this appeal.

(Vipul M. Pancholi, J)

( Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
GKS/-

U       T
 

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here