Gajraj vs Ajay Raghav @ Bobby on 4 March, 2025

0
68

Leave granted.

2. We have heard learned senior counsel for the

appellant and learned counsel for the respondents and

perused the material on record.

3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the

appellant has filed a complaint against the respondents

alleging that respondent No. 4 was the owner in

possession of 1/5th share in the agricultural land i.e.,

6 Kanals 6 Marlas of land bearing Khewat No. 902/860,

Khatoni No. 1058, M. No. 99, Killa No. ½ (5-10), 9/2/2

(2-4), 10 (5-14), 11 (3-16), 12/1 (4-4), 12/2 (3-16), M.

No. 157 Killa No. 8/1/1 (6-6) Kitta 7, measuring 31

Kanals 10 Marlas. Respondent No. 4 had entered into an

agreement to sell 5 Kanals of land from his share to one

RADHA SHARMA Suresh Kumar through a written agreement executed on

13.12.2010. An amount of Rs. 10 lakhs was given to

respondent No. 4 as earnest money.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here