Bakhti vs Financial Commissioner Revenue … on 10 March, 2025

0
39

Jammu & Kashmir High Court – Srinagar Bench

Bakhti vs Financial Commissioner Revenue … on 10 March, 2025

Author: Rahul Bharti

Bench: Rahul Bharti

                                             06
                                             Regular

     HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                 AT SRINAGAR
                                             WP(C) No. 498/2025
                                              CM No. 1191/2025


Bakhti                                       ..... Petitioner (s)

                    Through: Mr. Jahangir Iqbal Ganai, Sr.
                             Adv. with M/s Mehnaz Rather
                             and Mr. Junaid Malik,
                             Advocates.
                  V/s

Financial Commissioner Revenue Commissioner Agrarian
Reforms and Ors.
                                          ..... Respondent(s)
                     Through:
Coram:
           Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti, Judge.

                           ORDER

10.03.2025

1. Being aggrieved of long back attest of mutation No. 234

dated 17.07.1957 read with mutation No. 173 dated

15.06.1976 with respect to land comprising in estate

Devbugh tehsil Kunzer, district Baramulla which

purportedly ousted the petitioner from her co-sharer

ownership status qua the land inherited by her as co-sharer in

terms of the mutation No. 187 when she was a minor, the

petitioner came to invoke revisional jurisdiction of the
Page |2
WP(C) No. 498/2025
CM No. 1191/2025

Financial Commissioner, (Revenue), J&K under Section 15

of the J&K Land Revenue Act, 1996 on file No. 705/FC-AP

instituted on 23.08.2022 which has come to suffer rejection,

on account of delay and laches governing the institution of

revision petition, in terms of an order dated 27.12.2024

passed by the revisional authority of the Financial

Commissioner (Revenue) J&K bringing the petitioner herein

to invoke writ jurisdiction of this Court under article 226 of

the Constitution of India being left with no other legal

remedy against the said outcome.

2. Issue notice to the private respondent No. 4 to 7. The

petitioner shall furnish registered postal covers within a

period of seven days, whereupon notice shall go to the

private respondents No. 4 to 7

3. Sent for the record of File No. 705/FC-AP of 2022 titled

“Mst. Bakhti Vs. Tehsildar, Kunzer, and Ors.

4. In the meantime, in order to preserve the lis, no 3rd party

interest to be created qua the property in reference forming

subject matter of the impugned mutations. This direction is,
Page |3
WP(C) No. 498/2025
CM No. 1191/2025

however, subject to objections from other side and till next

date of hearing.

List on 28.04.2025.

(Rahul Bharti)
Judge
SRINAGAR
10.03.2025
Aasif

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here