Neelamma vs Gowramma on 10 March, 2025

0
122

The plaintiff filed this suit for partition, separate possession,
mesne profits and injunction.

2. a) The case of the plaintiff in brief is that,
defendant No.1 is her mother, defendant Nos.2 to 7 are her
sisters and defendant Nos.8 & 9 are her brothers. Father of the
plaintiff by name Sri.Srinivasa Reddy expaired on 07.12.1990,
leaving behind the plaintiff and defendants No 1 to 9 as legal
hairs. Father Sri.Srinivasa Reddy and mother/defendant No.1
had purchased the properties jointly under the registered sale
deed dated 18.07.1966 from Ramaswamy Reddy and another
registered sale deed dated 08.01.1971 from Abdul Khader, which

are described as suit schedule properties. The suit schedule
properties are the self-acquired properties of Late Sri.Srinivasa
Reddy. After his death, plaintiff and defendants continued in
peaceful possession and enjoyment of suit schedule properties.
The plaintiff and defendants are the only heirs who are entitled
for share in the estate of Late Srinivasa Reddy and they are
entitled for equal share in the suit schedule property. The
plaintiff approached the defendants seeking partition in the suit
schedule properties, but the defendants have not agreed to
effect partition. Hence, the plaintiff has filed this suit. Her father
Late Sri.Srinivasa Reddy died intestate. After the death of
Srinivasa Reddy, plaintiff and defendants are entitled for equal
share in the suit schedule properties.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here