passed by the learned Sub Judge-VI, Gopalganj in
Title Suit No. 589 of 2005, whereby and whereunder the learned
trial court rejected the amendment petition dated 27.04.2017
filed by the plaintiffs/petitioners under Order VI Rule 17 of the
Code of Civil Procedure (for short ‘the Code’).
03. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the petitioners are the plaintiffs before the learned trial court and
they have filed Title Partition Suit No. 589 of 2005 for their
claim of half share of the suit property apart from other relief(s).
The matter proceeded and the plaintiffs adduced their evidence
and while the matter was at the stage of evidence of the
plaintiffs, the plaintiffs filed an application dated 27.04.2017
under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code for amendment in the
plaint. The defendants filed their rejoinder on 25.05.2017,
challenging the maintainability of the amendment petition. The
learned trial court, vide order dated 30.06.2017, rejected the
prayer made by the plaintiffs for amendment, which is under
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1702 of 2017 dt.28-02-2025
challenge before this Court.
[ad_1]
Source link