Satvir Minhas vs . State Of Himachal Pradesh on 13 March, 2025

Date:

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Satvir Minhas vs . State Of Himachal Pradesh on 13 March, 2025

Satvir Minhas vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Cr.MP(M) No.509 of 2025

13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.

Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate

General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the

respondent-State and seeks time to file status report. Status

report be filed on or before the next date of hearing.

List on 17.03.2025.

The petitioner-accused apprehends his arrest in a case

registered against him vide FIR No.2 of 2025 dated 08.01.2025,

under Sections 420, 468, 471, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code

and Sections 13(1A) & (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act,

2018 at Police Station, SV & ACB, Una, District Una, Himachal

Pradesh.

In view of the averments in the application and also the

submissions made by learned counsel, it is directed that in the

event of arrest of the petitioner-accused in this case, he shall be

released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds in the

sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the

satisfaction of the arresting Police Officer/Investigating Officer,

subject to following conditions:-

(i) Petitioner, at the first instance, shall appear before
the Investigating Officer, Police Station, SV & ACB,
Una, District Una, H.P., on 15.03.2025 at 11.30 a.m;

(ii) Petitioner shall join the investigation of case as and
when called for by the Investigating Officer in
accordance with law;

(iii). Petitioner shall not hamper the investigation in any
manner whatsoever;

(iv). Petitioner shall not contact the complainant(s),
threaten or browbeat them or to use any pressure
tactics in any manner whatsoever;

(v). Petitioner shall not leave India without prior
permission of the Court;

(vii). Petitioner shall not make any inducement threat or
promise, directly or indirectly, to the investigating officer
or any person acquainted with the facts of the case to
dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court
or any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence.

( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related