Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
448/302/201/120B Of The Indian Penal … vs In Re: Salma Khatun on 6 March, 2025
Author: Debangsu Basak
Bench: Debangsu Basak
1
D/L 30
07.03.2025
Rohit
ct.no.26
C.R.M. (DB) 4161 of 2024
In Re: An application for cancellation of bail under
Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973/under Section 483(3) of the BNSS, 2023 in
connection with Khargram Police Station Case No.
389/2023 dated 11.10.2023 under sections
448/302/201/120B of the Indian Penal Code.
And
In Re: Salma Khatun
...Petitioner
Ms. Shabana Hasin
Ms. S. Akter
...for the petitioner
Mr. Madhusudan Sur
Mr. A. Bhattacharyya
...for the State
Mr. Pratip Kumar Chatterjee, Sr.Adv
Mr. Mihir Kundu
Ms. Maitrayee Chatterjee
...for the O.P No. 2
1.
Petitioner seeks cancellation of bail granted by
order dated February 6, 2024 passed in CRM (DB)
358 of 2024 as modified by the order dated
October 1, 2024 passed in IA CRAN 1 of 2024,
CRM (DB) 358 of 2024.
2. Post-bail misconduct is the ground alleged.
3. State and the private opposite parties are
represented.
4. Learned Advocate appearing for the State submits
that out of proposed twenty one charge-sheeted
witnesses four stands examined at trail. Next dates
2
are fixed for the purpose of examining four other
prosecution witnesses. He submits that, the
allegation of threat to the prosecution witnesses
were investigated into and a police case, inter alia,
under Section 195A of the Indian Penal Code was
registered as against the accused. The private
opposite party is not an accused is such a police
case.
5. In such circumstances, since the allegation of
post-bail misconduct remains unsubstantiated we
are not minded to cancel the bail existing in favour
of the private opposite party.
6. C.R.M. (DB) 4161 of 2024 is, therefore, disposed
of.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)
[ad_1]
Source link