Ravi Anand vs The State Of Bihar on 17 March, 2025

0
40

Patna High Court – Orders

Ravi Anand vs The State Of Bihar on 17 March, 2025

Author: Satyavrat Verma

Bench: Satyavrat Verma

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79117 of 2023
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2023 Thana- MOKAMAH District- Patna
                  ======================================================
                  RAVI ANAND son of Pravin Chandra Chaudhary Village- 197/1 68, Trivant
                  Kutir Near MES College Palman State Sancole Ps- Verna Dist- Goa South
                  Goa
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
            1.     The State of Bihar
            2.     Pushpanjali Bhavya wife of Ravi Anand, D/o- Vijay Kumar Village-
                   Moldiyar Tola W.No-10, Ps- Mokama Dist- Patna
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Shashank Shekhar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Dr. Indiwar Kumari
                                                   Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey
                                                   Ms. Kumari Pallavi
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

11   17-03-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf

of the OP No. 2.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 307,

323, 376, 498A, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

petitioner being husband has been falsely implicated in the

instant case by the informant, it is next submitted that informant

was married to the petitioner at Goa on 26-4-2021, thereafter it is

alleged that the petitioner used to take her to various clubs and

used to intoxicate her and thereafter unknown persons used to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79117 of 2023(11) dt.17-03-2025
2/4

establish physical relations with her and when she disclosed the

said fact to her parents, the accused person including the

petitioner tried to kill her by pouring kerosene oil, but somehow

she managed to save herself and thereafter it is alleged that

petitioner, in order to fabricate evidence, used the mobile of the

OP No. 2 and sent messages to different customers in order to

portray that it was the OP No. 2 who was instrumental in

committing the misdeeds.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would

manifest that the same is cryptic, vague and does not inspire

confidence for the reason that the FIR does not disclose the name

of the club where the OP No. 2 was taken and was intoxicated for

the purposes of establishing physical relations, it is also

submitted that the allegation of torture and abuse is general and

omnibus in nature, it is further submitted that the entire

occurrence is alleged to have taken place at Goa, but then instead

of instituting an FIR at Goa, the instant FIR, which arises from a

complaint case, came to be instituted in Bihar, it is next

submitted that had the FIR been instituted at Goa, the Goa Police

would have been in a better position to investigate the case, but

then instituting the case within the jurisdiction of Patna with

respect to an occurrence alleged to have taken place at Goa and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79117 of 2023(11) dt.17-03-2025
3/4

that too with cryptic details, whether the Patna Police would be

in a position to even investigate the case fairly, it is also

submitted that the OP No. 2 in order to cover up her misdeed

very wisely implicated the petitioner with an allegation that he

used her mobile for the purposes of sending messages to

customers, it is next submitted that the marriage was an arranged

marriage, as such in absence of specific details, it is difficult to

believe the allegations.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that

petitioner has filed Marriage Petition No. 88 of 2023 in the

learned Family Court, Goa, seeking divorce from the OP No. 2

on the grounds of adultery, it is further submitted that despite OP

No. 2 receiving notice in the said case, chose not to appear before

the learned Family Court, Goa, rather moved before the Hon’ble

Supreme Court by filing Transfer Petition Civil No. 926 of 2024

for transferring Marriage Petition No. 88 of 2023 to the State of

Bihar, it is submitted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court by its order

dated 26-9-2024 was pleased to dismiss the Transfer Petition

Civil No. 926 of 2024 filed by the OP No. 2, it is next submitted

that OP No. 2 now cannot take this plea that she does not have

any notice of the matrimonial case filed by the petitioner seeking

divorce on the ground of adultery before the learned Family

Court, Goa, it is also submitted that the case is proceeding ex
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79117 of 2023(11) dt.17-03-2025
4/4

parte and the judgement is awaited.

6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

informant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the

petitioner, but then is not in a position to rebut the submission of

the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the

allegation as alleged in the FIR is cryptic, vague and lacks in

essential details and the Transfer Petition Civil No. 926 of 2024

filed by the OP No. 2 seeking transfer of Marriage Petition No.

88 of 2023 has been dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned

counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the

event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court

within a period of six weeks from today, be released on

anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is

pending/successor court in connection with Mokama P.S. Case

No. 123 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under

Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J)
SUMIT/-

U     T
 

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here