Thakur Rangji Maharaj Virajman Mandir, … vs Union Of India Thr. Its Secretary on 20 March, 2025

0
32

1. This appeal arises out of a suit filed by the

appellant which is a Temple Trust. It appears that the

land subject matter of suit bearing Khasra No.11 (Area 3

Bigha, 1 Biswa), Khevat No.1, situated at Mauza Basai,

Tehsil and District Agra is admittedly owned by the

appellant. The courts have found that the appellant is the

owner of the said land. After recording the finding that

the appellant is the owner of the land and that the said

land is being used by the respondent for beautification of

Taj Mahal, the courts did not grant relief of injunction.

It appears from the decision in second appeal that a prayer

was made by the learned senior counsel appearing for the

appellant that damages ought to have been awarded. This

prayer was made in the light of what is recorded in

paragraph 9 of the impugned judgment which reads thus:

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here