Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Himanshu Nanawati vs Union Of India (2025:Rj-Jd:16728) on 1 April, 2025
Author: Manoj Kumar Garg
Bench: Manoj Kumar Garg
[2025:RJ-JD:16728]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 927/2025
1. Himanshu Nanawati S/o Shri Dharmendra Nanawati, Aged
About 35 Years, R/o Gali No. 2, Ratitalai, Dist. Banswara
2. Ritu Nanawati W/o Shri Himanshu Nanawati, Aged About
36 Years, R/o Gali No. 2, Ratitalai, Dist. Banswara
3. Dharmendra Nanawati S/o Shri Vipin Chandra Nanawati,
Aged About 63 Years, R/o Gali No. 2, Ratitalai, Dist.
Banswara
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Central Bureau Of
Investigation
2. Smt. Naseema W/o Hakimuddin, R/o Nai Abadi, Banswara
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vineet Jain, Sr. Advocate assisted
by Mr. Harshvardhan Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Mr. P.C. Solanki, for UOI
Mr. Parikshit Nayak for complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
01/04/2025
The instant criminal misc. petition under Section 528
B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioners for quashing of FIR
No.2212024ALE0003/2024 registered at Police Station CBI/EO-III,
New Delhi and all consequential proceedings for offences under
Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 474 & 120-B of IPC on the
basis of compromise entered between the parties.
Counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has
already been compromised between the parties and it is borne out
from the compromise that respondent No.2-complainant is not
(Downloaded on 01/04/2025 at 09:46:55 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:16728] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-927/2025]
inclined to proceed further in the matter. Counsel has placed
reliance on a decision of Supreme Court in the case of Gian
Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303]. In
these circumstances, the impugned FIR and all consequential
proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise. The
document of compromise has been filed and the same is hereby
taken on record.
Counsel for the respondent No.2 (complainant) concurs the
fact of compromise and submits that in view of the compromise,
the respondent No.2 (complainant) does not want to proceed
further in the matter.
In view of compromise arrived at between the parties and
applying the ratio in decision of Gian Singh (Supra), I deem it
just and proper to invoke inherent powers of this Court under
Section 528 B.N.S.S.
Accordingly, the present misc. petition is allowed and the FIR
No.2212024ALE0003/2024 registered at Police Station CBI/EO-III,
New Delhi and all consequential proceedings for offences under
Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 474 & 120-B of IPC lodged
against the petitioners are hereby quashed on the basis of
compromise deed.
Stay application also stands decided.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
26-Rashi/-
(Downloaded on 01/04/2025 at 09:46:55 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_1]
Source link