Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati
Pudhota Rajesh, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 2 April, 2025
Sl.No.37
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATHI
MAIN CASE No: CRIMINAL PETITION No.3484 OF 2025
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. OFFICE
DATE ORDER
No. NOTE
02.04.2025 1. Heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the petitioner was arraigned
as A.5 in C.C. No.57 of 2022 on the file
of the Court of the I Additional Junior
Civil Judge-cum-I Additional Judicial
Magistrate of First Class, Chirala, for the
alleged offence under Section 379 of the
Indian Penal Code, Section 21(ii) of the
Mines and Minerals (Development and
Regulation) Act, 1957, Section 3 of the
Prevention of Damage to Public Property
Act, 1984 and Section 3 read with
Sections 181, 5 and 180, section 146
read with section 196 of the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988.
3. It is further submitted that the petitioner
is the owner of the jeep and has no
connection with the alleged crime. It is
submitted that the investigating officer
and the complainant are one and the
same and that on the complaint of the
investigating officer, the police have
registered the F.I.R., investigated into
2
CRL.P. No.3484 of 2025
and subsequently filed charge sheet.
4. Considering the same, there shall be
stay of appearance of the petitioner/A.5
in C.C.No.57 of 2022 on the file of the
Court of the I Additional Junior Civil
Judge-cum-I Additional Judicial
Magistrate of First Class, Chirala, except
on the dates when his presence is
required as directed by the learned
Magistrate.
5. Issue notice to the 2nd respondent.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioner is
permitted to serve personal notice on the
2nd respondent by registered post with
acknowledgement due and file proof of
service.
7. Post on 06.05.2025.
____________________
JUSTICE HARINATH.N
BV
[ad_1]
Source link


