Prakash T vs Amara on 29 March, 2025

0
30

The complainant has filed this complaint under

Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the

accused, alleging that the accused has committed an

offense punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instruments Act.

02. The brief facts of the Complainant’s case are as

under;

The Complainant submits that towards payment and

towards the discharge of his liability, the accused issued

cheque bearing No. 320533 dated 26.06.2019 for Rs.

4,00,000/- drawn on M/s. Federal Bank Ltd., Jalahalli

Branch, Bengaluru – 560 015. Reposing confidence in the

accused, the complainant presented the said cheque for

encashment through bankers i.e. State Bank of India,

Peenya SSI Branch, Bengaluru, but the aforesaid cheque

returned with endorsement as “Funds insufficient ” as per

the cheque return memo dated 27.06.2019. The factum of

dishonour of a cheque duly communicated to the accused

through legal notice dated 08.07.2019. The notice sent to

the accused through RPAD was duly served on

11.07.2019. Despite the service of notice and lapse of the

statutory period of 15 days, the accused did not come

forward to pay the cheque amount nor issued a reply

notice. Therefore, the accused persons have committed an

offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instruments Act.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here