Narendra Pal Singh Tomar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 March, 2025

0
54

1. Service of notice on the second respondent is deemed to be

complete as per the office report.

2. Leave granted.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the

learned counsel appearing for the first respondent/State.

4. The appellant has been summoned by the Trial Court under

Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short,

“the Cr.PC”) to face trial for the offences punishable under

Sections 34(2) and 47A of the MP Excise Act, 1915 and Sections 420,

467, 468, 471 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. A charge-

sheet was filed, in which, the appellant was not named as an

accused. After the evidence of six prosecution witnesses was

recorded, an application was made under Section 319 of the Cr.PC.

On 18th November, 2021, the learned Sessions Judge allowed the

application under Section 319 of the Cr.PC and a warrant was issued

against the appellant. The order of the Sessions Court was

challenged by the appellant before the High Court.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here