Ram Pratap Yadav @ R.P. Yadav vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home … on 27 March, 2025

0
48

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondent and Shri Piyush Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C (now Section 528 B.N.S.S) has been preferred with a prayer to set-aside the impugned order dated 15.02.2025 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Rae Bareli on the application no. 1028Kha preferred by the applicant in Sessions Trial no. 11/2020 (State Versus Suresh Yadav and others) arising out of Case crime no. 0366 of 2019, Under Sections: 147, 148, 149, 323, 302, 201, 120-B and 216 1.P.C. Police Station: Harchandpur, District: Rae Bareli, as contained in (Annexure No. 01) to this application, during the pendency of application, in the interest of law and justice; with a further prayer that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct the learned Sessions Judge, Raebareli to abstain from or not pass final judgement in the case, arising out of Sessions Trial no. 11/2020 (State Versus Suresh Yadav and others) arising out of case crime no. 0366 of 2019, Under Sections: 147, 148, 149, 323, 302, 201, 120-B and 216 I.P.C., till the final disposal of the present application.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here