Sanjiv Rai @ Sanjeeb Rai vs The State Of Bihar on 4 April, 2025

0
65

Patna High Court – Orders

Sanjiv Rai @ Sanjeeb Rai vs The State Of Bihar on 4 April, 2025

Author: Prabhat Kumar Singh

Bench: Prabhat Kumar Singh

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70308 of 2024
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2019 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Sanjiv Rai @ Sanjeeb Rai Son of Dhuri Rai @ Dhurkheli Rai Resident of
                 Village - Sukumarpur, P.S. - Raghopur (Rustampur), District - Vaishali

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Pramod Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP
                                                    Mr. Mahendra Thakur, Adv.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   04-04-2025

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P.

for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for

offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 452, 326,

354, 307, 302, 201, 120(B), 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code

and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not

participated in the alleged crime. Co-accused namely

Dharmendra Rai @ Darmendra Kumar Yadav, Rama Rai @

Ramakant Rai and Sanjay Rai, carrying identical allegation to

that of petitioner, have already been granted bail by coordinate

Benches of this Court, vide order dated 21.10.2019 in Cr.Misc.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70308 of 2024(3) dt.04-04-2025
2/3

No. 14407/2020, order dated 09.11.2020 in Cr.Misc. No.

29892/2020 and order dated 24.02.2021 in Cr.Misc. No.

2616/2021 respectively. Petitioner is in custody since

15.05.2024.

4. However, learned counsel for the informant

vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submits that

recently, bail petitions of two co-accused namely Santosh Rai @

Golu Rai and Ajay Rai have been rejected by a coordinate

Bench of this Court, vide order dated 19.07.2024 passed in

Cr.Misc. No. 51312/2024 and order dated 06.02.2025 passed in

Cr.Misc. No. 74287/2024 and as such, bail petition of petitioner

be also rejected.

5. Considering the fact that petitioner is in custody

since 15.05.2024 and the fact that similarly situated co-accused

persons have already been granted bail, let the above named

petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.

10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. District & Sessions

Judge – VII, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Sessions

Trial No. 397 of 2023, arising out of Raghopur (Rustampur O.P.)

P.S. Case No. 126 of 2019, with following conditions:

“(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of
territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court below,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70308 of 2024(3) dt.04-04-2025
3/3

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with
the trial of the case, failing which the Court below
shall be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond of the
petitioner, and

(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country
without permission of the trial Court.”

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay

U T

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here