Md. Mahmud Alam @ Mahmud @ Nepali vs State Of Jharkhand on 4 April, 2025

0
35

Prayer

1. All the appeals preferred on behalf of the appellants under

Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 for

2025:JHHC:10447-DB

setting aside the order dated 11.03.2024 passed in Misc. Cr.

Application No.801 of 2024 [In Cr. Appeal No. 940 of 2024],

order dated 07.03.2024 passed in Misc. Cr. Application No.706

of 2024 [In Cr. Appeal (DB) No.937 of 2024], order dated

07.03.2024 passed in Misc. Cr. Application No.708 of 2024 [In

Cr. Appeal (DB) No.938 of 2024], order dated 21.03.2024

passed in Misc. Cr. Application No.887 of 2024 [In Cr. Appeal

(DB) No.941 of 2024] and order dated 21.03.2024 passed in

Misc. Cr. Application No.882 of 2024 [In Cr. Appeal (DB)

No.942 of 2024] by the learned A.J.C. XVIII-cum-Spl. Judge,

ATS, Ranchi, in connection with ATS Court Case No.01 of

2024, arising out of ATS P.S. Case No.10 of 2023, whereby

and whereunder, the appellants’ prayer for regular bail have

been rejected.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here