Shanmugham vs The State Of Karnataka, By Indiranagara … on 3 April, 2025

0
29

This appeal is by the Accused, before the Trial
Court who suffered the judgment of conviction for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 279, 337, 338 of IPC, Sec.
115 R/w Sec.117, 146 R/w 196 of IMV Act passed
by Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court-I Bengaluru,
in CC.No.11962/2016, dtd. 12.6.2024, challenging
the validity of the judgment.

2. For the sake of convenience the parties
hereinafter will be referred to with their ranking
assigned before the trial court.

3. The facts of the case:-

It is the case of the prosecution that, on
22.02.2015, at about 10:15 am, the accused riding
on Honda Activa Vehicle number KA-03 EY-3452
drove his vehicle recklessly and negligently from the
side of the double road towards the 100 feet main
road, at the junction of 100 feet road, 17th main road
within the jurisdiction of Indiranagar traffic police
station, drove his vehicle carelessly and negligently
from the side of Double Road towards 100 feet road

without giving priority to the main road and even
though the complainant gave instructions to the
accused to stop the vehicle, who was on traffic duty
at the junction of 100 feet road, 17th main road, the
accused did not stop the vehicle and drove towards
Koramangala from Indiranagar side. As a result of
collision with the moving motor cycle No. KA-03 HV-

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here