Chandan Paswan vs Shakuntala Devi on 10 April, 2025

0
79


passed by learned Sub Judge-IV, Patna in Title Suit

No. 5387 of 2014 whereby and whereunder the petition filed by
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1166 of 2023 dt.10-04-2025

the plaintiff/ respondent no. 1 under Order 22 Rule 4 of the

Code of Civil Procedure (in short “the Code”) for substitution of

defendant no. 4 and 5 by their heirs/legal representatives has

been allowed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petition was filed by the plaintiff under Order 22 Rule 4 of the

Code for substitution of deceased defendant no. 4 and 5 but no

application for setting aside the abatement has been filed and no

orders have been passed for setting aside such an abatement

which set in after passage of 90 days from the dates of death of

the deceased defendant no. 4 and 5. Learned counsel referred to

the Order 22 Rule 4 clause 3 of the Code which prescribes

where within the time limited by law no application is made

under said Sub Rule 1 of Rule 4 of Order 22 of the Code the suit

shall abate as against the deceased defendant. Thus, learned

counsel submits that the impugned order is illegal and could not

be sustained.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here