Punjab-Haryana High Court
Manish Rohre vs State Of Punjab on 17 April, 2025
Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:050092
101
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-20562-2025
Date of Decision:- 17.04.2025
Manish Rohre
....Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI
Present:- Mr. Abhijeet Sohal, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. Vinay Kumar Malhotra, DAG, Punjab.
*****
AMARJOT BHATTI, J.
1. Petitioner Manish Rohre has filed this petition under Section
482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory
bail in FIR No.0017 dated 12.02.2024, under Sections 420, 406 of IPC and
Section 66-D of I.T. Act, registered at Police Station City Dhuri, District
Sangrur (Annexure P-1).
2. Learned counsel for petitioner pointed out that co-accused
Dheerendra Nirmalkar has been granted interim relief by Coordinate Bench
vide order dated 16.04.2025. Even petitioner has never directly in touch
with the complainant nor he ever instructed the complainant to transfer any
amount in his account or any other bank account. He is falsely implicated
in this case and on this ground, he is seeking relief of ad-interim bail.
3. Notice of motion
4. On advance notice, Mr. Vinay Kumar Malhotra, DAG, Punjab
1 of 2
::: Downloaded on – 17-04-2025 23:40:07 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:050092
CRM-M-20562-2025 -2-
appears on behalf of State. He referred to the order dated 20.02.2025
(Annexure P-3) where it was made clear that present petitioner was not
nominated in the FIR nor he was required by the investigating agency and
on that ground said bail application was dismissed. Learned counsel
representing State on instructions from Inspector Harjeet Kaur still insisted
that factual position is the same. Petitioner is still not required by the
investigating agency.
5. In view of the aforesaid factual position, present anticipatory
bail petition filed by petitioner Manish Rohre is premature and stands
disposed of having rendered infructuous.
6. In case petitioner is required for investigation in the present
FIR then he may be given prior notice.
7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed
of accordingly.
(AMARJOT BHATTI)
JUDGE
17.04.2025
sunil devi
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
::: Downloaded on - 17-04-2025 23:40:08 :::
[ad_1]
Source link