BA1/484/2025 on 9 April, 2025

Uttarakhand High Court

BA1/484/2025 on 9 April, 2025

Author: Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench: Rakesh Thapliyal

                                                                                2025:UHC:2679
                Office N ot e s,
              r e por t s, or de r s
              or pr oce e dings
SL.
       Date     or dir e ct ions                      COURT'S OR JUD GE'S ORD ERS
N o.
              a nd Re gist r a r 's
                  or de r w it h
                  Signa t ur e s
                                       BA1 N o. 4 8 4 of 2 0 2 5
                                       Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the
applicant.

2. Mr. V.S Pal, learned AGA for the State.

3. Present applicant-Sharvwan, is seeking
regular bail in relation to first information
report dated 01.03.2025 bearing FIR No. 0264
of 2025, Police Station Laksar, District
Haridwar, wherein the present applicant has
been implicated for the offences punishable
under Section 2/3 of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters
and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act,
1986.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant
submits that the present applicant has been
falsely implicated only on the basis of
disclosure of name of the present applicant by
the other co-accused.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant further
submits the present applicant have no nexus
with the gang leader-Arvind. Apart from this, he
submits that there are three cases against the
present applicant which has been shown in the
FIR i.e.

i) Case Crime No.1221 of 2024 for the
offence punishable under Section 109(4) of
B.N.S read with Section 3/25 of Arms Act,
P.S. Laksar, District Haridwar.

ii) Case Crime No.1120 of 2024, for the
offences punishable under Sections 309(4),
317(2) of B.N.S, P.S. Laksar District
Haridwar

iii) Case Crime No.1183 of 2024 for the
offences punishable under Sections 309(4),
317(2) of B.N.S., P.S. Laksar, District
Haridwar.

iv) Case Crime No.93 of 2024 for the
offences punishable under Section
8/60/21, P.S. Piran Kaliyar District
2025:UHC:2679
Haridwar.

6. He also submits that in all the aforesaid
cases, the present applicant is on bail.

7. On the other side, Mr. V.S. Pal, learned
AGA for the State, submits that the present
applicant is a habitual offender and indulge in
criminal activities, which is evident from the
cases, the reference of which, have been given
in the FIR and the two cases relate to the
robbery and one case relates to the NDPS Act.

8. Apart from this, Mr. V.S. Pal, learned
AGA for the State also pointed out that there is
one more case in which the applicant is an
accused relates to Case Crime No.1065 of 2024
for the offences punishable under Section
309(4) and 317(2) of BNS Act, 2023, P.S.
Laksar, District Haridwar.

9. After hearing the arguments as advanced
by learned counsel for the parties and further
after gone through the contents of the FIR and
the nature of the cases with regard to the other
cases, in which the applicant is an accused, at
this stage, this Court is of the view that the
applicant is not entitled to be enlarged on bail.

10. Accordingly, the bail application is
rejected.

(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
09.04.2025
R.Bisht
2025:UHC:2679