Calcutta High Court
Sterling And Wilson Private Limited vs M/S. Bridge And Roof Co. India Limited on 11 April, 2025
Author: Shampa Sarkar
Bench: Shampa Sarkar
OCD-16 & OC 198 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL DIVISON EC/49/2024 STERLING AND WILSON PRIVATE LIMITED VS M/S. BRIDGE AND ROOF CO. INDIA LIMITED AND IA NO. GA-COM/1/2025 IN AP-COM/14/2025 M/S. BRIDGE AND ROOF CO. INDIA LIMITED VS STERLING AND WILSON PRIVATE LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR Date : 11th April, 2025. Appearance: Mr. Priyankar Saha, Adv. Ms. Srijani Mukherjee, Adv. . . .for the award-holder. Mr. Rabindra Kumar Mitra, Adv. Mr. Sobhon Kumar Pathak, Adv. . . .for the respondent in GA 1 of 2025
And AP-COM 14 of 2025
. . . for the petitioner in EC 49 of 2024
The Court:
RE: EC 49 of 2024
GA COM 1 of 2025 filed in AP COM 14 of 2025, is running in the monthly
list as item no.198. Both the learned advocates for the parties consent that the
2said (GA COM 1 of 2025) must be disposed of first, before EC 49 of 2025 is taken
up.
Thus, GA COM 1 of 2025 filed in connection with AP COM 14 of 2025, is
taken up along with EC 49 of 2024.
RE: GA COM 1 of 2025 in AP COM 14 of 2025
This is an application for extension of the time to file the bank guarantee
before the learned Registrar, Original Side, High Court, Calcutta. By an order
dated January 30, 2025 this Court had disposed of the application under Section
36(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 directing that in the event a
sum of Rs.1,94,00,000/- was secured by way of bank guarantee to the
satisfaction of the Registrar, Original Side, High Court Calcutta, the execution
shall remain stayed till the disposal of the application under Section 34 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner submits that, an extension
may be given as the bank guarantee could not be prepared within the time
prescribed by the Court. Further prayer is that the unconditional stay be
extended by a further period of two weeks and be continued till the disposal of
the application under Section 34 of the said Act.
Under such circumstances, this Court is of the view that the prayer is
innocuous and should be granted. GA COM 1 of 2025 is disposed by extending
the time to furnish the bank guarantee as directed in the order dated January
30, 2025, till May 1, 2025.
The unconditional stay of the execution case will continue up to May 1,
2025. The order dated January 30, 2025 is accordingly modified. If the bank
guarantee is deposited within the extended time, the stay of execution will
3continue till disposal of the application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996.
For non-compliance of this order, EC/49/2024 will continue. Liberty to
mention.
(SHAMPA SARKAR, J.)
sp/