Gade Nerelamma vs The State Of Ap on 24 March, 2025

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati

Gade Nerelamma vs The State Of Ap on 24 March, 2025

                                      /r



        IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT
                                                                         AIV[ARAV
                         (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
                MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARSCH

                       TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

                                             :PRESENT:

      HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMIVIAGADDA

                            WRIT PETITION NO.I 4667 OF 2025
  Betwee n.-
  Gade Nerelamma, w/o poll-su, aged about 72 years, R/o J. Annavaram
 village, Yeleswaram mandalam, Kakinada District.

                                                                               ...PetI-tiOner
                                                  AND
     1. The state of Andhra pradesh, Rep. by its principal Secretary

        (Revenue), secretariat buildings, velagapudi, Amaravathi.
    2. The Distrl'ct collector, Kakinada DI'StriCt, KakI'nada.

    3. The Tahsildar, Yeleswaram mandalam Kakl'nada DI'StriCt.

    4. The Station House offI-Cer,,Yeleswaram ps, KakI|nada District.
    5. Megham Manga Ratnam, w/o. prasada Rao, Agsed about 62 years,
        occ.-    House       wI'fe,        R/o.   J.    Annavaram   village,   Yeleswaram
       mandalam, East Godavari 'District.
R5 I-s impleaded as per the court's order dt.24.03.2025 in lA 02/25 I-n Writ
PetitI'On and affldavl®t.


                                                                        ...Respondents
       petI'tiOn under Artl'cle 226 of the constitution of lndI'a Its filed Praying
that in the circumstances stated in the affidavl-I filed therewith, the High
court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly
one jn the nature of writ of MANDAMUS to DECLARE the action of the
respondent officials        jn   interfering with         my peaceful possession and
 ___   /




                                               I/




          enjoyment of the dwelling thatched house property admeasuring an extent
          of Ac.     0-03 cents situated             in S.     No.    15 of J.      Annavaram village,
          Yeleswaram mandalam, Kakinada district inspite of a rehabilitation patta

          granted in my favor and without responding to the legal notice dated
          14.02.2025, without following due p`rocedure established by law, without

          giving fair opportunity and sufficient hearing, as illegal, arbitrary, violative
          of principles of natural J'uStiCe, unreasonable, contrary tO the Provisions Of
          AP Assigned Land (Prohibition of Transfer) Act,1977 and the rules made
          thereunder as amended from time to time as also contrary to Articles 4 and
          300-A     of   Constitution     of        India    and     consequently    COMMAND            the
          respondent officials not to interfere with my peaceful possession of the

          Property Without following the Procedure established by law by considering
          my legal notice dated 14.02.2025, jn the interest of justice;
          lANO: 1 OF2025:

                  Petition   under Section          `151     CPC     is   filed   praying   that   in   the

          circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the
          High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent not to interfere with
          my peaceful possession of the` property admeasuring an extent of Ac. 0-03
          Cents Situated in Plot No. 246. of S. No. 15 of J. Annavaram village,

          Yeleswram mandalam, Kakinada district, in the interest of justice, pending
          disposal of WP.No.4667 of 2025, on the file of the High Court.
                The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and
          the affidavit filed in support thereof and the High Court order dated
          20.02.2025     made    herein        and      upon       hearing    the   arguments      of sri
          J.V.Phaniduth, Advocate for the -I.Petitioner and GP for Revenue for the
          Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and G.P for Home for the Respondent No.4, the
          Court made the following;

          ORDER:

J7

l[lnterim order granted earlier shall stand extended till the next

date of hearing.

List the matter after one` (01) week.” \1 \

sD/-A. V!JA¥A+BABu”

ASS

–==`.

                                //TRUE COPY//        SEC
                                             Fol

To,

1. One CC to Sri. J.V.Phaniduth, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

3. Two CCs to GP for Land Acquisition, High Court of AP [OUT]

4. Two cos to GP for Stamps & Registration, High Court of AP [OUT]

5. One spare copy
AJ
HIGH COURT

NV,J

DATED..24.03.2025

Ll-st the matter after one (o1) week

ORDER

WP.No.4667 of 2025

INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED

1’_i .