Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati
Gade Nerelamma vs The State Of Ap on 24 March, 2025
/r
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT
AIV[ARAV
(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARSCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
:PRESENT:
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMIVIAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO.I 4667 OF 2025
Betwee n.-
Gade Nerelamma, w/o poll-su, aged about 72 years, R/o J. Annavaram
village, Yeleswaram mandalam, Kakinada District.
...PetI-tiOner
AND
1. The state of Andhra pradesh, Rep. by its principal Secretary
(Revenue), secretariat buildings, velagapudi, Amaravathi.
2. The Distrl'ct collector, Kakinada DI'StriCt, KakI'nada.
3. The Tahsildar, Yeleswaram mandalam Kakl'nada DI'StriCt.
4. The Station House offI-Cer,,Yeleswaram ps, KakI|nada District.
5. Megham Manga Ratnam, w/o. prasada Rao, Agsed about 62 years,
occ.- House wI'fe, R/o. J. Annavaram village, Yeleswaram
mandalam, East Godavari 'District.
R5 I-s impleaded as per the court's order dt.24.03.2025 in lA 02/25 I-n Writ
PetitI'On and affldavl®t.
...Respondents
petI'tiOn under Artl'cle 226 of the constitution of lndI'a Its filed Praying
that in the circumstances stated in the affidavl-I filed therewith, the High
court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly
one jn the nature of writ of MANDAMUS to DECLARE the action of the
respondent officials jn interfering with my peaceful possession and
___ /
I/
enjoyment of the dwelling thatched house property admeasuring an extent
of Ac. 0-03 cents situated in S. No. 15 of J. Annavaram village,
Yeleswaram mandalam, Kakinada district inspite of a rehabilitation patta
granted in my favor and without responding to the legal notice dated
14.02.2025, without following due p`rocedure established by law, without
giving fair opportunity and sufficient hearing, as illegal, arbitrary, violative
of principles of natural J'uStiCe, unreasonable, contrary tO the Provisions Of
AP Assigned Land (Prohibition of Transfer) Act,1977 and the rules made
thereunder as amended from time to time as also contrary to Articles 4 and
300-A of Constitution of India and consequently COMMAND the
respondent officials not to interfere with my peaceful possession of the
Property Without following the Procedure established by law by considering
my legal notice dated 14.02.2025, jn the interest of justice;
lANO: 1 OF2025:
Petition under Section `151 CPC is filed praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the
High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent not to interfere with
my peaceful possession of the` property admeasuring an extent of Ac. 0-03
Cents Situated in Plot No. 246. of S. No. 15 of J. Annavaram village,
Yeleswram mandalam, Kakinada district, in the interest of justice, pending
disposal of WP.No.4667 of 2025, on the file of the High Court.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and
the affidavit filed in support thereof and the High Court order dated
20.02.2025 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of sri
J.V.Phaniduth, Advocate for the -I.Petitioner and GP for Revenue for the
Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and G.P for Home for the Respondent No.4, the
Court made the following;
ORDER:
J7
l[lnterim order granted earlier shall stand extended till the next
date of hearing.
List the matter after one` (01) week.” \1 \
sD/-A. V!JA¥A+BABu”
ASS
–==`.
//TRUE COPY// SEC
Fol
To,
1. One CC to Sri. J.V.Phaniduth, Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
3. Two CCs to GP for Land Acquisition, High Court of AP [OUT]
4. Two cos to GP for Stamps & Registration, High Court of AP [OUT]
5. One spare copy
AJ
HIGH COURTNV,J
DATED..24.03.2025
Ll-st the matter after one (o1) week
ORDER
WP.No.4667 of 2025
INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED
1’_i .