Avinash Khandelwal vs The State Of Jharkhand … … Opposite … on 17 April, 2025

0
16

Jharkhand High Court

Avinash Khandelwal vs The State Of Jharkhand … … Opposite … on 17 April, 2025

Author: Ananda Sen

Bench: Ananda Sen

                                                        2025:JHHC:11664


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                         A.B.A. No. 3461 of 2024
                                    ------
     Avinash Khandelwal, aged about 33 years, son of Raj Kumar
     Khandelwal, resident of Anjani Bhawan, Bhawani Path Dindli, Shiv
     Mandir Road, P.O. Adityapur, P.S.-Adityapur, Seraikela, Kharsawan,
     Jharkhand-831013                             ... ... Petitioner
                                   Versus
     The State of Jharkhand                   ... ... Opposite Party
                                    ------
                      CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J.

——

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate.

                            :    Ms. Ashwini Priya, Advocate
     For the State          :   Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate
                            :    Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate
                                     -----


12/ 17.04.2025

Heard Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner

who appears through Video Conferencing and learned counsel for

the State.

2. This anticipatory bail application under Sections 438 and 440

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been preferred by the

petitioner apprehending his arrest for offences registered under

Sections 341, 323, 376(2)(h), 376(2)(n), 504, 506 and 34 of the

Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the allegations made in the FIR, the learned counsel

for the petitioner stated that petitioner is innocent and has been

falsely been implicated in this case by the informant with ulterior

motive and ill intention and both petitioner and informant were

adults and had entered into a consensual relationship.

4. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for

anticipatory bail.

5. I have gone through the records. The informant came in

contact with the petitioner when her husband left her and shifted

1
2025:JHHC:11664

to Germany. Physical relationship was established between them

and the same continued even after the marriage of the petitioner.

Only when she became pregnant, this case has been lodged.

6. Considering the fact that both the petitioner and the

informant were major and the relationship was consensual, I am

inclined to allow this Anticipatory Bail Application. Accordingly, this

Anticipatory Bail Application stands allowed. The petitioner, above

named, is directed to surrender before the learned court below

within four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and

on the event of his surrender or arrest, he shall be released on bail

on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of

learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikela, in connection with

Adityapur P.S. Case No.107 of 2024, subject to the condition that

one of the bailers should be a close relative of the petitioner and

other should be a resident of State of Jharkhand, having sufficient

landed property in his name or in the name of his ancestors in

which he is having share and to that effect, he has to file an

affidavit before the Trial Court indicating his share in the property.

(ANANDA SEN, J.)
Rashmi/ Cp-2

2

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here