Supreme Court Of India
(From : AIROnline 2023 KAR 2240)
Sudhanshu Dhulia,
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
, JJ
Employees State Insurance Act (34 of 1948) , S.85(a), S.2(17)— Employees’ State Insurance – Failure to pay contributions – Liability for – Appellant had allegedly failed to deposit with ESIC, amount deducted from wages of employees of company – Concurrent findings were recorded that Appellant was described as General Manager in records of company, which could not be controverted by him – Definition of ‘principal employer ‘includes a ‘managing agent’ of Owner/Occupier in the case of a factory or ‘named as manager of factory and for ‘any other establishment’, would include ‘any person responsible for supervision and control of establishment’ – Designation of a person would be immaterial if such person otherwise is an agent of Owner/Occupier or supervises and controls establishment – Material on record showed that Appellant falls within ambit of S. 2(17) of the Act, being a ‘managing agent’ – Conviction of appellant was proper.
AIROnline 2023 KAR 2240-AffirmedAIROnline 1996 SC 1129-Distinguished1991 Lab IC 52 (SC)-Distinguished
(Para 19
20)
…..
Step 1
Enter your contact details.
[ad_1]
Source link
