Kamlesh Son Of Ramprasad vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:16536) on 21 April, 2025

0
32


Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

Kamlesh Son Of Ramprasad vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:16536) on 21 April, 2025

Author: Sameer Jain

Bench: Sameer Jain

[2025:RJ-JP:16536]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

        S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2212/2025
Kamlesh Son Of Ramprasad, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of
Neemsara, Police Station Khatoli, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota
(Rajasthan)
                                                                          ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2.       Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3.       Superintendent Of Police, Kota Rural, Distt. Kota Rural
         (Raj.)
4.       S.h.o.      Police       Station     Itawa,        District      Kota    Rural
         (Rajasthan)
                                                                    ----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)             :     Mr. Vishnu Bohra
For Respondent(s)             :     Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with
                                    Mr. Subham Sain, AAAG



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

                                    Judgment

21/04/2025

The present petition is filed seeking directions for fair and

transparent investigation in pursuance to the investigation

initiated qua the FIR No. 30/2025 registered at Police Station

Itawa, District Kota Rural (Raj.) for offenses under sections

308(2), 351(2), 352, 318(4) & 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., 2023.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that FIR

was registered on 21.01.2025. Further, learned counsel has

submitted that in spite of repeated persuasions of the petitioner,

no concrete actions are initiated by the investigating agency.

(Downloaded on 22/04/2025 at 10:26:09 PM)

[2025:RJ-JP:16536] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2212/2025]

Thence, the fundamental rights of the petitioner are being

violated.

Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection if

personal hearing is given before and by the concerned

Superintendent of Police of the jurisdiction and representation of

the petitioner be considered on the said date.

In light of the same, and in light of the directions

encapsulated in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

[(2008) 2 SCC 409] it is directed that on 28.04.2025 at 11.00

AM, the petitioner shall mark his presence before respondent No.3

who will give audience to the petitioner and take appropriate

decision, strictly in accordance with law.

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending

applications, if any, shall stand disposed.

(SAMEER JAIN),J

DEEPAK/49

(Downloaded on 22/04/2025 at 10:26:09 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here