passed in Reference Case No. 03 of
2016 by the Learned Presiding Officer, Labour
Court, Patna, (hereinafter referred as
“impugned order”) whereby and whereunder,
he has been pleased to reject the claim of
petitioner that he is covered under the
definition of employee as stated in Section 2(d)
of The Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions
of Service) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred as
“Sales Promotion Employees Act”) as well as
Patna High Court CWJC No.5202 of 2022 dt.19-04-2025
his termination from company without hearing
him during the process of enquiry has been
upheld which is absolutely illegal and goes
against a statutory definition given in the Sales
Promotion Employees Act as well as in many
decisions of the this honourable High Court as
well as of Supreme Court of India.
[ad_1]
Source link