Pampana Kalyani vs State Bank Of India on 22 April, 2025

0
65

The above Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of respondent
in freezing the petitioner‟s salary from May, 2024 onwards, in pursuance
of order passed by the arbitral tribunal in ARB/PCHFL/PL/26/2024/97
dated 03.05.2024, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and
300A of the Constitution of India.

Page 4 of 11

2. a) The petitioner, a Government Teacher, filed the above writ
petition. In the affidavit, it was averred that the petitioner has been
working as a Teacher, PMSRHI ZPP Girls High School, Ganapavaram,
since 2009. The monthly salary of the petitioner Rs.83,103/- is credited
to her bank account No.30933722886 of State Bank of India,
Gandhinagar Branch, Vijayawada. The petitioner obtained a personal
loan of Rs.19.5 lakhs in December 2022, and an amount of Rs.38,530/-
is being deducted as EMI. The remaining amount of Rs.44,573/- has
been freezed by the respondent from May, 2024 onwards without
jurisdiction and notice. When the petitioner approached the respondent
under Right to Information Act, the respondent replied that it received
order from TIS HAZARI COURTS Delhi to mark hold of petitioner‟s
account under section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for
short “the Act”). The petitioner is not aware of the freezing of her
account till receiving a reply under the Right to Information Act. The
petitioner had taken another loan of Rs.5,90,000/- from Piramal Capital &
Housing Finance Limited vide loan Account No.PLSA00046F2E on
12.05.2023 and an amount of Rs.14,033/- is being paid as EMI for five
months and later, the amount could not be paid due to financial crisis.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here