Satish vs Risal Singh on 22 April, 2025

0
32

[ad_1]

Vide this common Judgment, I shall decide the cases bearing no. CS
SCJ No. 612093/16 and CS SCJ NO. 612643/16.

A. FACTUAL MATRIX OF SUIT BEARING NO. 612093/16

1. Brief facts of the present case as per plaint are –

(i) that the grandfather of plaintiff Late Sh. Rati Ram was the
recorded Bhumidar of the agricultural land comprised in
Khata Khatoni No. 357/252 Min. and 207/65 having 1/3 share
out of the total land area measuring 97 bighas 19 biswas
situated within the revenue estate of village Bakkarwala,
Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘suit property’).

(ii) that the suit property is ancestral land and Sh. Rati Ram
inherited his share from his father Late Sh. Ami Lal. The
father of the plaintiff is also a co-bhumidaar in the said khata
as per his share mentioned in Annexure A & B. Sh. Rati Ram
dated 28.08.2009 leaving behind his three sons namely Risal
Singh, Chand Ram and Narain Singh and his two grandsons
Amarjeet and Yogesh sons of Late Chander Singh who was
predeceased son of Rati Ram.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here