B. S. Umesh vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 April, 2025

0
44

[ad_1]

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant was driving an auto-rickshaw. While negotiating a curve,

due to rash and negligent driving, the appellant lost control of the auto-rickshaw

resulting in the same toppling over and causing the death of Basappa and

Eramma and injury to Sushelamma, who were travelling as passengers along

with three others.

3. Apart from rash and negligent driving leading to casualties, as above, the

appellant should have been careful in not allowing six passengers to travel in an

auto-rickshaw which, normally, has a seating capacity of 1 + 3.

4. Be that as it may, there are concurrent findings of three courts convicting

the appellant under Sections 279 and 304-A, Indian Penal Code, 1860 as well as

Sections 66(1) and 192 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 1 read with Rule 21(10) of

the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989. The appellant having been sentenced to

a year’s simple imprisonment together with fine of Rs.2,000/-(Rupees two

thousand) has served only a few days of his term imprisonment.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here