Sujan Muthuru Sujan Kumar Naidu vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 21 April, 2025

0
23

[ad_1]

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati

Sujan Muthuru Sujan Kumar Naidu vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 21 April, 2025

APHC010188852025
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                AT AMARAVATI                [3457]
                          (Special Original Jurisdiction)

              MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL
                 TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
                               PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
                    CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4054/2025
Between:
Sujan @ Muthuru Sujan Kumar Naidu and    ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
Others
                                  AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and    ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S)
Others
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
   1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
   1. CHALLAGALI GOPALARAJU
   2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
                                    -2-
                                                  CRL.P. No.4054 of 2025

              THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
                      I.A. Nos.3, 4 and 5 OF 2025
                                 IN/AND
                CRIMINAL PETITION No.4054 of 2025
COMMON ORDER:

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for

the 2nd respondent/de facto complainant submit that the parties have

amicably settled their dispute and have filed I.A. Nos.3, 4 and 5 of

2025, accompanying the affidavit of the 2nd respondent/ de facto

complainant and the joint memo, seeking the permission of this

Court to allow the petitioners/A.1 to A.13 and the de facto

complainant to compound the offence under Sections 147, 148, 341,

307, 324 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered

against the petitioners in Crime No.73 of 2024 of Khajipet Police

Station, Y.S.R. Kadapa District.

2. The petitioners and the 2nd respondent/de facto complainant are

present in the Court. The parties were identified by their respective

counsels. The identity cards of both the parties were verified.

3. The 2nd respondent submits that, pursuant to the intervention of well-

wishers, she has withdrawn the allegations made against the

petitioner. She further confirmed that the compromise was reached

voluntarily, without coercion or undue influence.
-2-
CRL.P. No.4054 of 2025

4. Recording the submissions of the 2nd respondent, I.A. Nos.3, 4 and

5 of 2025 are allowed and the proceedings in Crime No.73 of 2024

of Khajipet Police Station, Y.S.R. Kadapa District, against the

petitioners for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 341, 307, 324

read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, are hereby quashed.

5. Accordingly, the criminal petition is allowed.

6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal petition shall

stand closed.

____________________
JUSTICE HARINATH.N

Dt.21.04.2025
BV

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here