Bombay High Court
Mahesh S/O Rajesh Pipare And Another vs The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. … on 24 April, 2025
Author: Avinash G. Gharote
Bench: Avinash G. Gharote
2025:BHC-NAG:4251-DB
1 wp6080.24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 6080 OF 2024
1) Shri Mahesh s/o Rajesh Pipare,
Aged about 32 years,
Occupation - Educated Unemployed
Engineer, R/o Human Nagar, Ward No.1,
Chamorshi, Tahsil - Chamorshi,
District - Gadchiroli.
2) Shri Mukesh s/o Diwakar Manapure,
Aged about 32 years,
Occupation - Educated Unemployed
Engineer, R/o Talodhi, Tahsil - Chamorshi,
District - Gadchiroli. ....PETITIONERS
VERSUS
1) The State of Maharashtra,
through Secretary, Rural Development
Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.
2) The Chief Executive Officer,
Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli.
3) The President, Deputy Chief Executive
Officer, Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli.
4) The Secretary, Works Division Committee,
Executive Engineer (Works Department),
Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli. .... RESPONDENTS
______________________________________________________________
Mr. I.K. Daudasare, Counsel for the petitioners,
Mr. Sachin Narale, A.G.P. for respondent No.1,
Mr. Jayant Mokadam, Counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 4.
______________________________________________________________
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE &
ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE : 24-04-2025
2 wp6080.24.odt
JUDGMENT :
(Per : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)
Heard. RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of the
learned counsel for the parties.
2. By this petition, the petitioners question the issuance of the
advertisement dated 27-09-2024 by respondent No.3, thereby continuing
the process of allocating work pursuant to the advertisement dated
10-09-2024.
3. Mr. Mokadam, learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 4,
tendered across the bar a communication dated 23-04-2025 before the
Court, which is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. We
would like to reproduce the relevant paragraph of the said
communication, which reads as under :
“lq# vlysyh ;kfpdk dzekad 6080/2024 e/;s izkIRk ‘kklukps mRrj e/;s
eqnnk dzekad&17 yk ftYgk ifj”kn xMfpjksyh us f’k{k.k foHkkxkdMhy ,dq.k
157 dkes xzke iapk;r ,soth ‘kklu fu.kZ; fnukad 05-04-2023 uqlkj
lqf’k{khr csjkstxkj vfHk;ark@etwj lgdkjh laLFkk o [kqyk da=krnkj
oxZ ;kauk okVi dj.;kph dk;Zokgh gh fnukad 20-09-2024 P;k ‘kklu
fu.kZ;kiqohZph vlY;kus fnukad 20-09-2024 P;k rjrqnh ykxq gksr ulY;kps
EgVys vkgs- dfjrk ‘kklukus lknj dsysY;k ‘kiFki=kizek.ks ftYgk ifj”kn ps
iqohZph ykWVjh lqpuki= fnukad 10-09-2024 uqlkj lqf’k{khr csjkstxkj
vfHk;ark@etwj lgdkjh laLFkk o [kqyk da+=kVnkj oxZ ;kauk okVi dj.;kl ;k
dk;kZy;kph dkghgh gjdr ukgh-”
3 wp6080.24.odt
4. A bare perusal of the said paragraph would indicate that the
respondents have no objection to allotting the work to the petitioners as
per G.R. dated 05.04.2024, published vide advertisement dated
10.09.2024.
5. In view of the same, the petitioners, the unemployed engineers
registered with the department, would get the work in terms of the
Government Resolution dated 05-04-2023.
6. In such an eventuality, the petitioners’ grievance has been
redressed; therefore, the petition is disposed of in the above terms. Rule
is made absolute accordingly. No costs.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
adgokar
Signed by: MR. P.M. ADGOKAR
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 24/04/2025 19:33:50
[ad_1]
Source link