M/S. Bhagat Construction vs M/S. Aspira Loharuka Developers Llp on 21 April, 2025

0
52

[ad_1]

2. This is an application for appointment of an arbitrator in terms of Clause

16.0 of the agreement for construction dated February 1, 2018. The

disputes arose out of termination of the agreement and also non-payment

of dues. Several demand notices have been referred to by the petitioner in

support of the contention that the services rendered by the petitioner were

accepted by the respondent, but payments in respect thereof were not

made despite demand notices. The respondent replied to the demand

notice, by a letter dated August 21, 2023, inter alia, relying on the

termination of the contract. It was contended that, upon termination of

the contract, nothing was due and payable. That apart, all the money

claims of the petitioner were allegedly barred by limitation.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here