Shree Shakambhari Udyog vs Commissioner Of Income Tax on 25 April, 2025

0
20

and all these correspondences have been made

manually. Learned Senior Counsel has drawn our attention

towards the assessment order (Annexure ’15’) and the notice of

demand under Section 156 of the Act of 1961 attached therewith to
Patna High Court CWJC No.7244 of 2022 dt.25-04-2025

show that these documents have been signed by hand and not

digitally. It is submitted that in view of the scheme and the circular

referred hereinabove, these documents are to be held invalid.

11. Learned Senior Counsel has further submitted that it

would appear from the statements made in the counter affidavit

that there were three partners of the petitioner firm, namely, Smt.

Kumud Bagla, Mr. Pradeep Bagla and Mr. Rajesh Bagla. Smt.

Kumud Bagla sent a complaint on 22.02.2021 to the Department.

As per the said complaint, the petitioner had understated its actual

business receipt in order to defraud the revenue during the

financial year 2015-16 and 2016-17.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here