Kilari Anand Paul vs The State Of Ap Rep Pp on 4 April, 2025

0
30

[ad_1]

This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401

of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C’) challenging the

order dated 14.02.2017 in R.C.No.1816 of 2017 in Cr.No.229 of 2012, passed

by the learned III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ongole, in

taking cognizance against the petitioner/Accused No.1 and Accused Nos.2 to

4.

2. It should be pointed out at the threshold that the learned III Additional

Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ongole, instead of taking cognizance

against the offence, has taken cognizance against the accused. The Hon’ble

Apex Court in S.K.Sinha, Chief Enforcement Officer v. Videocon

International Limited1 held at paragraph No.20 that cognizance is taken of

an offence and not of an offender. The learned Magistrate missed this

fundamental principle in Criminal Cases while taking cognizance.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here