Manglaram Urf Mangliya S/O Shri Madaram vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:16919) on 22 April, 2025

Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

Manglaram Urf Mangliya S/O Shri Madaram vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:16919) on 22 April, 2025

Author: Sameer Jain

Bench: Sameer Jain

[2025:RJ-JP:16919]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

        S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2246/2025

1.       Manglaram Urf Mangliya S/o Shri Madaram, R/o Lavera,
         Jodhpur Rural.
2.       Sawai S/o Meetaram, R/o Village Baleta Malakheda,
         District Alwar Rajasthan.
                                                                        ----Petitioners
                                         Versus
1.       State       Of    Rajasthan,         Through         The     Learned   Public
         Prosecutor.

2. Moolchand @ Mulya S/o Sharwan, R/o Baleta, Malakheda,
District Alwar, Rajasthan.

—-Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv Prakash Dhanera
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP
Mr. B. L. Dhakhar with
Mr. Porush Sharma

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Judgment

22/04/2025

1. This petition under Section 528 of BNSS is filed, with a

prayer to quash the FIR No. 34/2025 registered at Police Station

Malakheda District Alwar for offences under Sections 115(2),

126(2), 352 BNS and Section 3(2)(VA), 3(1)(R) and 3(1)(S) of

ST/SC Act, on the basis of compromise effectuated between the

parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute.

2. Learned counsel for both the parties have submitted that the

dispute at hand is inter-se private in nature, which has been

resolved by the parties amicably.

3. Heard and considered.

(Downloaded on 28/04/2025 at 10:09:15 PM)

[2025:RJ-JP:16919] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2246/2025]

4. At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to place

reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in

Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and

Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in

[2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of which is reproduced

below:

“12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the
nature of the offence and the fact that parties have
amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly
consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can
quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers
under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non-
compoundable.”

5. In view of the position of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex

Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature

of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this

Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition.

Compromise is taken on record.

6. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal

miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No. 34/2025

registered at Police Station Malakheda District Alwar for offences

under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352 BNS and Section 3(2)(VA),

3(1)(R) and 3(1)(S) of ST/SC Act with all consequential

proceedings, are hereby quashed and set aside.

7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending

application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

(SAMEER JAIN),J

Pooja /29

(Downloaded on 28/04/2025 at 10:09:15 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)