[ad_1]
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the
consent of the parties.
2. Both these petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, are taken up for decision together, since common questions of
W. P. No. 2469-2018.odt
facts and law arise therein. The main challenge in both these Writ
Petitions is to the order of respondent- Deputy Director of Education,
who, vide his orders dated 29.06.2017 and 06.02.2018, cancelled the
approval granted by the Education Officer to the appointments of the
petitioners as “Shikshan Sevaks” and thereafter as “Assistant
Teachers”.
3. The learned Senior Advocate would submit that the Director of
Education did not have jurisdiction to either sit in appeal or review
the order passed by the Education Officer. According to the learned
Senior Advocate, neither the MEPS Act nor any regulation issued
thereunder authorizes the Director of Education to exercise such
powers.
[ad_2]
Source link