K V Gopalakrishnan vs Union Of India on 30 April, 2025

0
73

1. Leave granted.

2. The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, vide its judgment and order

dated 3rd March, 20201, allowed a writ petition2 of the respondents and

thereby reversed the judgment and order dated 13th February, 2019 of the

Central Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench3. The Tribunal allowed an

original application4 filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals

Act, 1985 by the appellant. Such reversal is the subject matter of challenge

in the lead appeal.

3. The appellant applied for a review5 of the impugned order (dated 3rd March,

2020). Although it was sought to be pointed out on behalf of the appellant

that there was an error apparent on the face of the record (because the

impugned order

Tribunal

OA No. 170/00178/2018

High Court had considered Office Memorandum6 dated 19th May, 2009 and

that the appellant had been granted Grade Pay of Rs.6600 long before such

office memorandum was brought into effect), the High Court proceeded to

dismiss the review by an order dated 1st April, 2022 resting on the law

declared by this Court in Kamlesh Verma v. Mayawati7. The order dated

1st April, 2022 is under challenge in the connected appeal.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here