Cmr Engineering Educational Soceity vs State Of Telangana on 2 May, 2025

0
21

Heard Mr. S.Niranjan Reddy and Sri D.Prakash Reddy,

learned Senior counsel representing Sri Tarun G. Reddy, learned

counsel for the petitioners, learned Advocate General and Sri

S.Rahul Reddy, learned Special Government Pleader and

Mr. M. Mehaboob Ali, learned Standing Counsel appearing for

respondent No.4 and Sri Prabhakar Peri, learned Standing counsel

for JNTU.

2. Lis involved in all these writ petitions is one and the

same. Therefore, they were heard together and decided by way of

this common order.

3. The Societies, the Colleges run by the Societies and

Secretaries of the Societies are before this Court.

4. This is third round of litigation. To modify/enhance, intake

of seats and merger of Courses, the petitioners submitted

applications before All India Council for Technical Education

(AICTE) and also Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University

KL,J
WP No.23539 of 2024 & batch

(JNTU) Hyderabad. The same were considered and permissions

were accorded permissions. Even then, respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 and

6 did not permit the petitioners from running its courses of B.Tech,

CSE, with the additional intake on the basis of the merger of

courses as approved by the AICTE. Therefore, petitioners filed writ

petitions vide W.P.No.19291 of 2024 and batch. Vide order dated

19.07.2024, this Court disposed of the said writ petitions directing

respondents 1, 2, 4 and 6 to examine the case of the petitioners for

increase in intake in the existing courses and also adjustment of

seats in other Courses as approved by AICTE and JNTU and for

inclusion of colleges in the counseling process for the Academic

Year 2024-25. This Court also directed the said respondents to

communicate the decision thereon to the petitioners within a period

of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here