[ad_1]
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Sukhdev Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:21153) on 2 May, 2025
Author: Nupur Bhati
Bench: Nupur Bhati
[2025:RJ-JD:21153]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4735/2025
Sukhdev Singh S/o Sulakhan Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o
Rodeasal Tarantaaran Police Thana Sadar District Tarantaaran
Punjab (At Presently Lodged In Central Jail Churu)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Om Rajpurohit
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Urja Ram, PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI
Order
02/05/2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties as well as perused the
material available on record.
2. The instant bail application has been filed by petitioner under
Section 483 B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.141/2025 dated
02.04.2025 registered at Police Station Sardarsahar, District
Churu for the offence under Section 8/15, 25 of the NDPS Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has been falsely roped in this case. He submits that contraband
recovered from the petitioner weighs well below the commercial
quantity. There are no previous criminal antecedents of similar
nature pending against the petitioner and thus, the petitioner
deserves to be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application,
however, is not in a position to refute the submissions made by
(Downloaded on 07/05/2025 at 09:22:02 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:21153] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4735/2025]
learned counsel for the petitioner as the contraband weighs below
commercial quantity and no criminal antecedents of similar nature
pending against the petitioner.
5. In view of above and, having regard to the entirety of facts
and circumstances of the case as available on record and looking
to the fact that the trial will consume time and without expressing
any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case and also looking to
the fact that the contraband recovered from the petitioner weighs
well below the commercial quantity, this Court is of the opinion
that the petitioner deserves to be released on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S.
is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Sukhdev
Singh S/o Sulakhan Singh arrested in relation to FIR
No.141/2025 dated 02.04.2025 registered at Police Station
Sardarsahar, District Churu shall be enlarged on bail provided he
furnishes a personal bond in sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties
of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge
for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of
hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J
SURABHII/310-
(Downloaded on 07/05/2025 at 09:22:02 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_2]
Source link