Patna High Court – Orders
Mohammad Sahabuddin @ Md. Shahabuddin @ … vs The State Of Bihar on 18 December, 2024
Author: Harish Kumar
Bench: Harish Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71424 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2023 Thana- PHULWARIA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Mohammad Sahabuddin @ Md. Shahabuddin @ Md. Saho, Son of Md. Asaraf, Resident of Ward No. 11, Phulwaria- 01 Ganj, Phulwaria (Phulwariya), P.S.- Phulwaria (Phulwariya), Distt.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 18-12-2024
Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and the
learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in
connection with Phulwaria P.S. Case No. 67 of 2023 registered
for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 341,
354, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Based upon the written report, the prosecution
alleges that on the fateful day while the informant along with his
brothers were going to his house, in the meantime, all the seven
F.I.R. named accused persons, including the petitioner, and two
unknown persons armed with deadly weapons surrounded the
informant. It is specifically alleged that co-accused Md. Rustam
assaulted the informant by means of iron rod. The allegation
against the petitioner is of assaulting the informant by means of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71424 of 2024(2) dt.18-12-2024
2/3
handle of hand-pump (Chapakal) on his head. While the mother
of the informant came to his rescue, she was also assaulted by
other accused persons. In the said occurrence, the informant and
his two brothers have also sustained serious injuries.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner drawing the
attention of this Court to the F.I.R. primarily contended that
though in the F.I.R. one Md. Saho, son of Md. Boudhu Marhum,
has been made accused along with other accused persons, but
despite the fact that the name of the petitioner is Md.
Sahabuddin @ Md. Shahabuddin @ Md. Saho, S/o Md. Asaraf
of different place, the police is chasing behind him only due to
similarity in the nick name. Learned Advocate for the petitioner
further contended that the petitioner has no concern with the
alleged crime, but on account of the atrocious act of the police,
he has been compelled to approach before this Court. It is next
contended that even if the allegation levelled against the
accused Md. Saho is concerned, the injury caused by him is
found to be simple in nature. In support of the aforesaid
contention, the injury reports, as contained in Annexures-2 and
3, have been brought on record. Moreover, co-accused persons,
having identical allegation, have been allowed the privilege of
anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 33417 of 2024
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71424 of 2024(2) dt.18-12-2024
3/3
vide order dated 28.05.2024.
5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State
opposes the bail application and submits that the petitioner has
actively participated in the crime and brutally assaulted the
informant and his brothers.
6. Regard being had to the submissions made on
behalf of the parties and considering the suspected complicity of
the petitioner in the crime, coupled with the fact that other co-
accused persons have been allowed anticipatory bail, let the
petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender
before the court below within four weeks from the date of
receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Begusarai in
connection with Phulwaria (Phulwariya) P.S. Case No. 67 of
2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438
(2) of the Cr.P.C. with the further condition that one of the
bailors shall be the own/close relative of the petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J)
uday/-
U T
[ad_1]
Source link