Uttarakhand High Court
Mam T A Negi …..Pet It Ioner vs St At E Of Ut T Arakhand And Anot Her on 23 December, 2024
2024:UHC:9851
I N TH E H I GH COURT OF UTTARAKH AN D
AT N AI N I TAL
TH E H ON 'BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUM AR VERM A
2 3 r d D ECEM BER, 2 0 2 4
W RI T PETI TI ON ( M / S) N O. 3 5 7 5 of 2 0 2 4
Mam t a Negi .....Pet it ioner
Versus
St at e of Ut t arakhand and Anot her .....Respondent s
Counsel for t he Pet it ioner : Mr. Arm aan Prat ap
Singh, Advocat e
holding brief of Mr.
Abhij ay Negi,
Advocat e.
Counsel for t he Respondent : Mr. C.S. Rawat ,
Nos. 1 and 2 Chief St anding
Counsel assist ed by
Mr. Suyash Pant ,
St anding Counsel.
H on'ble Alok Kum a r Ve rm a ,J.
The case of t he pet it ioner is t hat she is a
perm anent resident of Ward No. 6, Soniyana Gairsain,
Dist rict Cham oli. The Addit ional Secret ary, Urban
Developm ent Depart m ent , Governm ent of Ut t arakhand
has issued a t ent at ive Not ificat ion dat ed 14.12.2024.
The pet it ioner has subm it t ed her obj ect ions dat ed
20.12.2024 t o t he respondent no. 1, which are st ill
pending. Therefore, t he pet it ioner has filed t he present
writ pet it ion under Art icle 226 of t he Const it ut ion of
I ndia wit h t he following prayers:
” ( i) I ssue a writ , order or direct ion in t he nat ure of
m andam us, com m anding t he respondent , Dir ect or of1
2024:UHC:9851
Urban Developm ent t o t ake t he reasoned decision on
t he r epresent at ion dat ed 20.12.2024 as subm it t ed by
t he pet it ioner in t he office of Direct or of Ur ban
Developm ent ( Annexur e No.1) .
( ii) I ssue a w rit , order of direct ion in t he nat ure of
m andam us direct ing t he r espondent St at e t o pass a
reasoned and speaking order on t he repr esent at ion as
preferr ed by t he pet it ioner, in line wit h t he order as
passed by t his Hon’ble Court in WPMS No. 3551 of
2024 ( Annexur e No. 3.)
( iii) Pass any ot her order t hat t his Court m ay
deem ed fit in t he int erest of j ust ice equit y and good
conscious.”
2. Mr. Arm aan Prat ap Singh, learned counsel
holding brief of Mr. Abhij ay Negi, learned counsel for
t he pet it ioner and Mr. C.S. Rawat , learned Chief
St anding Counsel assist ed by Mr. Suyash Pant , learned
St anding Counsel for t he respondent no. 1 and
respondent no. 2.
3. Mr. C.S. Rawat , learned Chief St anding
Counsel appearing for t he respondent s has subm it t ed
t hat t he quest ion of reservat ion has already been
finalized, t herefore, t he present writ pet it ion has
becom e infruct uous.
4. Wit h t he consent of bot h t he part ies, t he
present writ pet it ion is dism issed as infruct uous.
___________________
ALOK KUM AR VERM A, J.
Dat e: 23.12.2024
Shiksha
Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA
SHIKSHA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,
ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,
2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c
24b5aa08b09c12f21822fbd40bf639b1c,
BINJOLA
postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND,
serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A5
42D7FF0A9BED00E67B5283D205F18FE29BDF
5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA
2
Date: 2024.12.23 19:25:04 +05’30’
[ad_1]
Source link
