Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Julfkar vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:22737) on 12 May, 2025
Author: Manoj Kumar Garg
Bench: Manoj Kumar Garg
[2025:RJ-JD:22737]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 574/2025
Julfkar S/o Shri Abdul Hussain Urf Afjal Hussain, Aged About 42
Years, Resident Of Ward No. 39, Chuna Bhatta Mohalla, Sati
Road, Purohiton Ki Bagichi Ke Pas, Jhunjhunun, District
Jhunjhunun (Raj.). (Presently Lodged In Sub Jail, Deedwana)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gulab Singh Bhati
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Rajpurohit, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
12/05/2025
An application (Inward No.01/25) under Section 5 of the
Limitation Act has been filed by the counsel for the petitioner for
condoning the delay in filing the criminal revision petition.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is
hereby allowed.
Delay in filing the criminal revision petition is hereby
condoned.
Heard on the criminal revision petition.
The present criminal revision petition under Section 397/401
Cr.P.C. (Section 438 R/w 442 BNSS) has been filed by the
petitioner against the order dated 21.06.2022 passed by the
learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Deedwana, District Nagaur in
Criminal Appeal No.68/2018, by which the learned Appellate Court
has partly allowed the appeal and modified the judgment dated
(Downloaded on 14/05/2025 at 03:36:36 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:22737] (2 of 3) [CRLR-574/2025]
11.10.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Deedwana,
District Nagaur in Criminal Original Case No.149/2016 while
acquitting the petitioner for offence under Sections 498-A and 406
IPC while giving benefit of Section 4 of Probation of Offenders Act
on the condition that the petitioner shall deposit a bail bond as
well as a surety bond of Rs.25,000/- each within one month to
maintain peace and good behaviour and not to repeat the offence
again for a period of six months and also deposit Rs.5,000/- as
prosecution expenses under Section 5 of the Probation of
Offenders Act within a period of one month.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to some
unavoidable circumstances, the petitioner could not comply with
the order dated 21.06.2022 passed by the appellate Court.
Thereafter he moved an application for extension of time period
for depositing the amount, as ordered by the appellate Court, but
the same was also dismissed vide order dated 30.04.2025 and
since then the petitioner is in judicial custody. Counsel further
submits that the petitioner is ready to comply with the order dated
21.06.2022 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge,
Deedwana, Nagaur, therefore, some more time may be granted.
Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the prayer
made by the counsel for the petitioner and submits that the
present revision petition may kindly be dismissed.
I have considered the arguments advanced before me and
carefully gone through the material available on record.
Since the petitioner is now ready to comply with the order
dated 21.06.2022 passed by the appellate Court and deposit the
amount, as ordered as well as to submit the bail bonds. Therefore,
(Downloaded on 14/05/2025 at 03:36:36 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:22737] (3 of 3) [CRLR-574/2025]
ten day’s more time is hereby granted to the petitioner to comply
with the order dated 21.06.2022 passed by the learned Addl.
Sessions Judge Deedwana, District Nagaur. If the petitioner
comply with the order dated 21.06.2022 passed by the appellate
Court, within the stipulated period, then he may be released
forthwith, if not required in any other case.
With the above directions, the revision petition as well as
stay petition is disposed of.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
104-Ishan/-
(Downloaded on 14/05/2025 at 03:36:36 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_1]
Source link