Jammu & Kashmir High Court
Mohd Iqbal vs Ajit Kumar Sahu Secy. Education Deptt … on 23 December, 2024
Author: Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Bench: Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Sr.No. 136
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
Case: CPSW No. 742/2018
In SWP No. 2816/2017
Mohd Iqbal ....Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through :- None.
V/s
Ajit Kumar Sahu Secy. Education Deptt and ....Respondent(s)
another
Through :- Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG.
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
23.12.2024
It has been brought to the notice of this Court by Mr. Raman Sharma,
learned AAG that the Apex Court in SLP No. 17409 of 2021 in case titled,
“U.T. of Jammu and Kashmir and others Vs. Jatinder Singh and another“,
has already put a rider that no appointment henceforth be made insofar as the
Rehbar-e-Taleem (ReT) is concerned and in the instant contempt petition, the
petitioner is seeking compliance of the order dated 08.12.2017, whereby a
direction was issued to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner in
the light of recommendations made by CEO, Poonch as well as ZEO, Surankote
as ReT.
Thus, according to Mr. Raman Sharma, learned AAG, the order passed by
this Court in the light of the rider imposed by Apex Court, could not be
implemented. This is the precise reason perhaps and there is no representation
on behalf of the petitioner as well.
In view of the above, proceedings in the instant contempt petition are
closed. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged.
Contempt petition, is accordingly, ‘disposed of’.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
Jammu:
23.12.2024
Renu Bala Renu
2024.12.24 12:08
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document