[ad_1]
Patna High Court – Orders
Javed Anwar vs The State Of Bihar on 21 May, 2025
Author: Chandra Shekhar Jha
Bench: Chandra Shekhar Jha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33901 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2022 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhojpur
======================================================
1. Javed Anwar S/O Late Md. Haroon Resident of Quarter no. 30/3/2 Noor Md.
Munsi Lane 1st floor L.P. 150/10 Howrah, P.S Howrah,West Bengal
2. Yasmim Begum @ Yasmin Begum @ Yasmeen Begum W/O Javed Anwar
Resident of Quarter no. 30/3/2 Noor Md. Munsi Lane 1st floor L.P. 150/10
Howrah, P.S Howrah,West Bengal
... ... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Bihar
2. Sabana Khatun W/O Zeeshan Khan Resident of Quarter no. 30/3/2 Noor
Md. Munsi Lane 1st floor L.P. 150/10 Howrah, P.S Howrah,West Bengal,
D/O Alamgirh,presently residing village-Pakri,PS-Ara Naeada, Distt-
Bhojpur
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravindra Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh,APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
2 21-05-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
APP for the State.
2. The accused-petitioners, named in the F.I.R., are
apprehending their arrest in connection with Bhojpur Mahila
P.S. Case No. 09 of 2022 registered for the offences
punishable under Sections 323/341/498A/506/34 of the
Indian Penal Code and section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. The allegation against the petitioners is to commit
cruelty upon the informant namely, Sabana Khatoon being in-
laws as opposite party no. 2/informant could not fulfill the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33901 of 2025(2) dt.21-05-2025
2/3
demand of dowry as raised by the petitioners and her
husband.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner submitted that petitioners are in-laws and living
separately with the O.P. No. 2/informant and her husband. It
is submitted that there is no occasion to raise any demand of
dowry or to commit any physical cruelty upon the opposite
party no. 2.
5. It is submitted that even from perusal of F.I.;R.,
the thrust of allegation is available against the husband of
opposite party no. 2/informant and, moreover, the dispute
appears compromised between the parties for which
compromise petition was filed before the learned S.D.J.M.,
Bhojpur at Ara on 04.10.2024. While concluding argument, it
is submitted that petitioners are persons of clean antecedent.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the
prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
7. In view of the aforesaid factual submissions and by
taking note of the fact as petitioners are in-laws facing
general and omnibus allegation qua alleged cruelty, coupled
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33901 of 2025(2) dt.21-05-2025
3/3
with the fact that matter now prima-facie appears
compromised between the parties, accordingly, above-named
petitioner, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a
period of four weeks from this order, are directed to be
enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs.10,000/-
(ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial
Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with Bhojpur Mahila
P.S. Case No. 09 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid
down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/Section 482(2) of
the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (in short “B.N.S.S.”).
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Rajeev/-
U T
[ad_2]
Source link