Ramkishore Nirmalkar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 3 June, 2025

Chattisgarh High Court

Ramkishore Nirmalkar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 3 June, 2025

                                                              1




                             HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                                                  WPS No. 3981 of 2025


                   1 - Ramkishore Nirmalkar S/o Shri Bhagwat Prasad Nirmalkar Aged About 44
                   Years Occupation- Head Master (Suspended) At Government Primary School,
                   Awaspara Mangla, Sankul- Pasid, Block- Bilha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.), R/o
                   Beside Rama Electronic Masturi, Police Station And Tahsil- Masturi, District-
SUNITA  Bilaspur (C.G.) Mo. No.- 9827445998
GOSWAMI
                                                                                          ... Petitioner(s)
Digitally signed
by SUNITA
GOSWAMI
                                                           versus
Date:
2025.06.04
11:02:59 +0530

                   1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Education, Mahanadi
                   Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Raipur, Police Station- Rakhi, Tahsil And
                   District Raipur (C.G.)


                   2 - Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)


                   3 - District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)


                   4 - Block Education Officer, Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
                                                                                        ... Respondent(s)

2

Order Sheet

03/06/2025 Shri Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, counsel for the Petitioner.

Shri Akhilesh Kumar, G.A. for the State.
Heard on I.A.No.1/2025, an application for grant of stay.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was reinstated in service vide order dated
15.05.2025, however, his said reinstatement order has been
cancelled by order dated 22.05.2025 (Annexure P-1), which is
contrary to law.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the submission
made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel
for the parties, purely as an interim measure, it is directed that
the order of suspension dated 22.05.2025 shall remain stayed
till the next date of hearing.

Learned counsel for the State is directed to file Return
within four weeks and thereafter, the petitioner may file rejoinder
within one week.

List this case in week commencing 7th July, 2025.
I.A.No.2/2025 for urgent hearing and I.A.No.03/2025 for
hearing the case during Summer Vacation stand disposed of.

Sd/-

(Arvind Kumar Verma)
Judge

sunita