Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Nagarajan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 4 June, 2025
ITEM NO.1504 COURT NO.3 SECTION II-C
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) Nos. 621-622/2024
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29-11-2021
in CRLAMD No. 137/2015 29-11-2021 in CRLRC(MD) No. 248/2015 passed
by the High Court of Judicature at Madras at Madurai]
NAGARAJAN Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU Respondent(s)
[ HEARD BY : HON’BLE B.V. NAGARATHNA AND HON’BLE SATISH CHANDRA
SHARMA,JJ. ]
Date : 04-06-2025 These petitions were called on for pronouncement
of judgment today.
For Petitioner(s) :Mr. M.P. Srivignesh, Adv.
Mr. Lakshman Raja T., Adv.
Mr. Sharavena Raghul ASR, Adv.
Mr. Mithun Kumaar N, Adv.
Mr. Gokul Athithya R P, Adv.
Mr. Manu Srinath, AOR
For Respondent(s) :Mr. V.Krishnamurthy, Sr. A.A.G.
Mr. Sabarish Subramanian, AOR
Mr. Vishnu Unnikrishnan, Adv.
Ms. Azka Sheikh Kalia, Adv.
Ms. Jahnavi Taneja, Adv.
Mr. Veshal Tyagi, Adv.
Mr. Danish Saifi, Adv.
1 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma has pronounced
the non-reportable judgment of the Bench comprising Hon’ble
Mrs.Justice B.V.Nagarathna and His Lordship.
2. Leave granted.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
RAJNI MUKHI
Date: 2025.06.05
17:47:55 IST
Reason:
1
SLP (Crl.) Nos. 621-622/2024
3. The appeals are allowed in terms of the signed non-
reportable judgment and operative part of the judgment reads as
under:
“………17. In the circumstances, we set-aside the
conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 306
of IPC and confirm the judgment of the Sessions Court as
affirmed by the High Court qua the offences punishable
under Sections 354 and 448 IPC. Consequently, the appellant
is directed to undergo the sentence and to pay the fine as
imposed by the Sessions Court.
In the event the accused has not yet completed the
sentence imposed by the Trial Court, he is directed to
surrender before the jurisdictional Chief Judicial
Magistrate or before the concerned Police Station for being
lodged in the jail to suffer the remainder of the sentence.
In case of failure on the part of the accused to surrender,
appropriate action shall be taken up by the concerned
Police Station to arrest the accused for being lodged in
the jail.”
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(RAJNI MUKHI) (NIDHI MATHUR) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
(Signed non-reportable judgment is placed on the file)
2